Consequences of the Separability Presumption for the Choice of Law Applicable to Arbitration Agreements

Abstract

The paper intends to show what consequences the separability presumption can have for the choice of law that applies to arbitration agreements, namely the consequences that involve the application of different choices of law and its accepted standards. When discussing the separability and its consequences it is hard to keep the line and at the same time not to shake
the assumption that already exist in International commercial arbitration. The purpose of this paper is to show the inconsistencies that exist nowadays.